Is Bitcoin’s Resistance to Upgrade a Positive?

Bitcoin refuses to upgrade. It’s not its fault, it has a network of thousands of people that must approve an upgrade. But that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t upgrade. It probably should have by now. And the funny thing about it is reports state Bitcoin upgraded because it’s scared of altcoins taking over. That’s surely like a pitbull being scared of a Chihuahua. Well, they’re pretty scary.

unsplash.com/photos
unsplash.com/photos

Can you imagine an XRP buy being more expensive than a BTC buy? Below, we’ll explore whether Bitcoin’s resistance to upgrade is a positive.

What Does Upgrading Do?

Upgrading makes everything better. And you can’t ignore digital upgrades. Anything outdated is weak and vulnerable.

Cryptocurrency upgrades enhance a network’s capabilities and vulnerabilities. They can be anything from minor tweaks to significant overhauls.

In essence, upgrades are crucial for maintaining a cryptocurrency’s relevance and competitiveness. For Bitcoin, upgrades are meticulously planned, rejected by the network, planned again, and so on. It’s sensible – there’s no rushing, but at what cost? How vulnerable is the Bitcoin network? Attacks aren’t frequent, but upgrades should be.

The Bitcoin Taproot Upgrade

Bitcoin is upgrading. The Taproot upgrade represented a milestone in Bitcoin’s history, it was one of the most significant updates since it started.

This upgrade was not just a technical enhancement. It was a strategic move to make Bitcoin more competitive against rapidly evolving altcoins. Altcoins are threatening Bitcoin.

The upgrade improved transaction privacy and efficiency and made Bitcoin more appealing for broader use cases. Those include smart contracts. However, the careful and slow approach to this upgrade is typical of Bitcoin.

Such significant upgrades, though infrequent, are vital for Bitcoin to remain relevant as newer and more agile cryptocurrencies emerge.

Why Hasn’t It Upgraded Since?

Bitcoin’s cautious approach to upgrades is its community-driven nature. Major changes require a consensus. Consensus amongst that many people isn’t easy to achieve. There’s no government-style left-wing and right-wing.

This slow pace is a supposed protective measure against hasty decisions. However, this also means that Bitcoin might lag in implementing technological advancements quickly.

This conservative approach to development is its strength. It ensures unmatched security and reliability. Its weakness is it may struggle to adapt to new demands and innovations.

Does Bitcoin Have Scaling Problems?

Bitcoin’s scalability issues are a significant concern. The blockchain’s inherent limitations impact its ability to handle large volumes of transactions efficiently. Have you ever been on the Bitcoin network during a slow period? It’s a nightmare.

The network design has a block size limit and a 10-minute block time, restricting speeds. It needs to change.

Although the Lightning Network and SegWit have provided partial solutions by enabling off-chain transactions and increasing block capacity, they are more like temporary fixes.

The Bitcoin community wants long-term solutions, but reaching a consensus for fundamental changes remains a challenge. They’ll probably never reach an agreement. Think of it like crypto political warfare.

What Other Coins Upgrade and Perform Well?

Many altcoins exhibit agility in upgrading and evolving. They outpace Bitcoin in implementing new features and enhancements. Ethereum is a prime example, and Ethereum 2.0 addressed scalability and energy efficiency through a shift from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake.

Other cryptocurrencies like Cardano and Polkadot also frequently upgrade their protocols. They’re doing well. You’ll always see them on top coins to invest in reviews. These continuous upgrades enable these networks to adapt quickly to changing market conditions and technological advancements – and they’re frequently patched. They’re just safer.

This adaptability contrasts with Bitcoin’s more conservative approach. It highlights how diverse cryptocurrencies are.

What Coins Are Performing Well in 2024

  1. Bitcoin (BTC): As the original cryptocurrency, Bitcoin continues to lead the market with a capitalization of around $656 billion. Despite its price fluctuations – soaring to $48,005 in November 2021 and adjusting to around $38,481.
  2. Ethereum (ETH): Ethereum’s market cap is $239 billion. It’s massive. Its price journey, mirroring the volatility pattern, moved from about $8 in April 2016 to approximately $2300 by January 2024. The peaks and troughs of Ethereum’s price underscore the fluctuating nature of the crypto market.
  3. Tether (USDT): With a market cap of $74 billion, Tether is an excellent stablecoin. Its value is more consistent compared to other cryptocurrencies, thanks to the US dollar. Still, despite its intended stability, Tether has seen fluctuations.
  4. Binance Coin (BNB): Starting under $0.10 at its launch in 2017, Binance Coin has shown significant growth. In July 2017, it reached a peak of around $484. Its value stands at $240 with a market cap of $37 billion, showcasing its potential as a formidable cryptocurrency.
  5. Solana (SOL): Valued at around $75 by January 2024, Solana has come a long way. SOL has a market cap of $32 billion, and the coin is rapidly growing. It supports decentralized applications and smart contracts and is powered by a unique hybrid proof-of-stake and proof-of-history mechanism.
  6. Ripple (XRP): XRP has a market cap of $24 billion. The Ripple network for facilitating different currency exchanges is excellent. Its price journey from $0.004 in early 2017 to $0.45 by January 2024 has put it on the map.
  7. US Dollar Coin (USDC): USDC is a great stablecoin. It has a market cap of $20 billion. Pegged to the US dollar, it aims for a 1:1 ratio and is powered by Ethereum.
  8. Cardano (ADA): Cardano has a market cap of $14 billion. It stands out for its early adoption of proof-of-stake validation. ADA powers its platform for smart contracts and decentralized applications.

Bitcoin’s resistance to frequent upgrades is good and bad – you can’t argue that it’s done fine without it. It’s top of the charts and always will be. But the issue is scalability and security, not how many people are buying it. Do you think Bitcoin should start upgrading?

0